L'instabilit? en Ha?ti: le placer sous tutelle?

Les ?v?nements en Ha?ti pr?suppose qu'on verra un coup d'?tat pour le ni?me fois. Bush a supposement avis? les Ha?tiens de ne pas fuir aux ?tats-Uis car la Garde coti?re les arr?tera en haut-mer et les retournera chez eux. Je me demande si on ne devrait pas placer Ha?ti sous tutelle? ?videmment, le pays est compl?tement dysfunctionnel et la situation courrante m?nacent les citoyens de l'?le. Certain me d?nonceront pour raciste mais coment peut-il ?tre raciste de vouloir le bien pour les Ha?tiens qui m?ritent beaucoup mieux?

Je sais qu'on ne peut pas substituer aux habitants mais apr?s 2 si?cle des ?checs, coups d'?tats, tyrannies etc. Peut-on conclure que la culture politique ha?tienne est un cul-de-sac meurtier? qui exercerait la tutelle? Personellement, j'aimerais que ?a soit le Canada, les pays car?biens, la France sous l'autorit? du Conseil de tutelle de l'ONU. La dur?e serait de 5 ans et permetterait les tuteurs ? inculquer une nouvelle culture politique, instituer des nouvelles institutions politiques et dresser des reformes sociales n?cessaires. Apr?s il serait la responsilit? des Ha?tiens ? prendre leur destin en main.

Blair, bugs and spying on the UN

The revelations that Britian spied on the UN, specifically the Sectretary general and several countries that were rotating members of the Security council at the time, has provoked a firestorm. For Blair the revlation are all the more deplorable. After all it was his idea for the U.S. and Britian to go before the international body to seek authorization to invade Iraq.

Now it turns out that his proposal may have had an ulterior motive. Even worse is that from now on allies and sympathetic countries wil refuse to help out the Americans or British the next time ask for help on the war on the terrorists. It's not so much the revelations of the bugging- all countries do that- but the fact that neither the U.S. nor Britian trusted sufficently the allies and sympathetic countries enough nor believed sufficenly in the soundness of their intelligence to persuade the former on the rightness of the authourization.

t appears that the British and Americans had already made up their minds and would use the bugging as leverage to keep the allies or sympathetic countries in line. If they didn't approve explcitly than they'd acquiesce under pain of leakage of embarassing information. It's insulting that the Americans and British officials didn't respect enough a reasonable disagreement about Iraqi's weapons of mass destruction by the allies and sympathetic countries and pretty much expected them to toe the line. And to think that those countries were sovereign not satellites of the U.S. and Britian.

La vacunes contra el polio, la xar'ia i la superstitic?